Basic Metadata

NaBuCCo ID
5668
Museum No.
YBC 03944
Primary Publication
YOS 6 014
CDLI P-Identifier
P305256
Place of issue
No place
Regional setting
Uruk region
Places mentioned on Tablet
Huṣṣēti-ša-Amassu
Huṣṣēti-ša-Nabû-bān-ahi
Naṣībāta
Šihmūti
Archive
Eanna temple
Period
Neo-Babylonian
Babylonian Date (year-month-day):
Nbn. 01-00-00
Inferred date
555-554 BCE

Digeanna

Van Driel Files
9 b
Text Form
List (various verbs, or also no verb)
Legal Purpose
Balanced account (epēš nikkassī)
Transaction Type
transactional (janus)
Domain (Eanna)
Agriculture
Format of the tablet
portrait

Content

Paraphrase

264;0 of barley and 5;3.4.3 of emmer in the irrigation district (tamirtu) (tp)Šiḫmūti
198;0 of barley and 82;3.4.2 of emmer, in the district (šīḫu) of (tp)Nār-Innin, in (tp)Huṣṣēti-ša-Amassu

180;2.3 of barley and 16;3.4.2 of emmer in the karammu-silo of (tp)Nār-Innin on the royal highway 

50;0 of barley and 70;0 of emmer in (tp)Til-ḫurāṣi from the house of Iqīša

282;0 of barley and 19;1.1.3 of emmer in (tp)Naṣībāta

10;0 of barley in exchange for dates from the house of Arad-Innin/Bēl-aḫu-iddin for Nbn 3
10;0 in exchange for barley for the accession year of Nbn, in (tp)Til-ḫurāṣi: he withdrew it in Nbn 1 for the cattle fodder (kissatu)
10;0 of barley in exchange for 70;0 of dates that ŠŠU withdrew(?) from Iṣṣur in (tp)Kār-Eanna during the accession year of Nbn and gave to Gimillu/Nabû-šumu-iddin. A total of 20;0 (was received ?) from Gimillu.

675;0 of barley and 40;0 of emmer in exchange for the barley and emmer that Innin-zēru-ušebši gave at the gate of the (tp)Nār-rubbu to Bānitu-ēreš in exchange. Šamaš-šumu-ukīn (ŠŠU) withdrew it from Bānitu-ēreš. 

Total: 1 680;0 of barley and 244;1.4 of emmer, (belonging) to the impost (imdu) of Nbn 1, which ŠŠU carried (zabālu) from the karammu-silo of the countryside to Eanna and disbursed for expenses (telītu elû Š-st).

208;0 of barley from (tp)Huṣṣēti-ša-Nabû-bān-aḫi, from which Kulbību withdrew 1;34 of barley, and Nanāya-aḫu-iddin/Iqīša gave 75;0 at the canal (ḫirītu). 

Note 

It is possible that the copist took the obverse of the tablet for the reverse.


Further Information

created by
Marie Young, Sept. 12, 2025, 1:42 p.m.
last updated by
Marie Young, July 3, 2026, 1:56 p.m.