Basic Metadata

NaBuCCo ID
3158
Museum No.
AO 6802
Primary Publication
TCL 13 179
CDLI P-Identifier
P387244
Place of issue
Uruk city
Regional setting
Uruk region
Archive
Eanna temple
Period
Early Achaemenid
Babylonian Date (year-month-day):
Cam. [x]-[x]-[x]

Digeanna

Van Driel Files
2 h
Text Form
Protocol (...)
Legal Purpose
Dispute-related proceedings (qabû, amāru, abāku)
Transaction Type
transactional (incoming)
Domain (Eanna)
Higher-order management and policies
Format of the tablet
landscape

Navico

Theme
Slave/Oblate status
Oblate/Slave Role
Is sold (slave) (passive)

Content

Paraphrase

Demand by a woman for the return of her slave detained by the temple for her father’s debt.

This is a court procedure regarding a case of a woman claiming that a slave (qallu) that was detained by the temple was in fact given to her as part of her dowry (nudunnû). First the background of the case is laid out and then the current legal process. The end of the tablet is fragmentary and it is unclear how the case ended.

A, the Royal Overseer (ša rēš šarri bēl piqitti) of Eanna took (abāku) B, the slave of C from the house of his daughter fD, in Abu (V) 1 Camb. This was in lieu of C’s outstanding balance (rēhu ina muhhi) of sheep and goats (ṣēnu) belonging to (makkūru, lit. property of) the Lady-of-Uruk.

A, however, did not brand (šamātu) the slave with a star (kakkabu) and did not book (šaṭāru) him in the temple’s ledgers (lēˀu). Additionally, fD stated (qabû umma) that “he (i.e. B) is my dowry (nudunnû)”.

Later on (arku), on the 5th day of Ulūl (VI) 3 Camb (i.e. 2 years later), A brought in (abāku) fD and asked her to show him (kalāmu, D Imp.) her dowry tablet (ṭuppu nudunnû) or B’s sale tablet (ṭuppu šīmu kaspu, lit. price of silver) so that he may release (muššuru) him to (ina pāni) fD.

fD swears (nīšu zakāru) by the Lady-of-Uruk and Nanāya, in front of the assembly (puhru) that: “C, my father and fE, my mother gave (nadānu) me B for my dowry (nudunnû) and […], but the dowry and sale tablets are not in my house, … (the rest is fragmentary): … [ there are no(?)] other claims (rašûtu) … of F my husband (mutu), … […]”.

Witnesses (mukinnu): G1, G2, G3, G4, G5, G6, G7 (the last name must be the scribe).

 A= Nabû-ahu-iddin, Royal Overseer of the Eanna (ša rēš šarri bēl piqitti Eanna); B= Dannu-ahhēšu-ibni/fNanāya-šininni, slave (qallu) of C; C= Nanāya-ahu-iddin/Nergal-ina-tēšê-ēṭir (father of fD, husband of fE); fD= fUbartu/Nanāya-ahu-iddin (=C); fE= fInnatūa (wife of C mother of fD); F= Ištar-mukīn-apli (husband of fD); G1= Arad-Nergal/Kīnāya//[…]; G2= […]/Šamaš-šumu-ibni//Mandidu; G3= Ibnāya/[…]//[…]; G4= […]/Naˀid-Marduk//[…]; G5= […]-Mukkēa//[…]; G6= Innin-nāṣir […]; G7= […]-ra/Inn[in …]


Further Information

Type and Content
Court protocols
last updated by
Matthias Adelhofer, April 14, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
Imported (Person, Date)
Yuval Levavi, Kathleen Abraham (11/09/.2023)
Mentioned in the following publication(s)
Kozuh 2014
Moore, NBBAD (1935)